- Local every day in
The Buck Stops Where? Parcel B Debate Heats Up in Purchase
Residents watch the Harrison Planning Board’s current deliberations on a parcel of corporate property Purchase.
This year marks an anniversary that is no cause for celebration.
For more than 25 years the residents of Purchase, supported by the Purchase Environmental Protection Agency (PEPA), have been fighting to stop construction of a second building on a piece of land known as Parcel B, previously owned by Manhattanville College.
The issue originated with a three-parcel land sale that led to the creation of the corporate park along Manhattanvile Road in Purchase. Parcel A is the current Mastercard offices, Parcel C is The Centre at Purchase and Parcel B is the land in the middle.
The Parcel B issue arose when the corporate property owner attempted to build two buildings on their site instead of one. The residents in the area blocked the move, arguing that the site and surrounding roads were not adequate to support a second building on the property.
In an ideal world, residents would feel these concerns would be heard and acted on by the Harrison Planning Board. Unfortunately, that was not the case and valuable time and money had to be spent taking the case to the state supreme court.
Complicating matters, the corporate ownership of this parcel has all the signs of a convoluted shell game, with one corporation owning the land, then leasing it to another corporation for a dollar a year, who in turn leased it to corporate tenants, with no one standing up and taking responsibility. Everyone passed the buck along so that residents and PEPA were forced to serve notices to all of the corporations and chase responses between each of them.
Upon hearing the issue the New York State Supreme Court did what one would have hoped our planning board would have done in the first place, agreeing with the residents’ position that the parcel was not suitable for two buildings. The court put in a stipulation that the corporate owner could build their original building on the site only by signing a stipulation that only one building would ever be allowed on the land.
One would think that that would be the end of the matter. Not so.
Purchase Corporate Park Associates is again seeking to build a second office building on the site and has sent its application to the planning board.
While disappointing, it is not surprising that the corporate resident is not acting as a trustworthy community neighbor, instead seeking to ignore their agreement terms and the court. We get it – this corporate neighbor is only looking out for their own short-term interests regardless of community concerns, legal agreements and court ordered stipulations.
But what about the planning board? What is surprising and disappointing is that after all the history on this parcel of land that the planning board didn’t immediately shut the matter down by denying this application for the second building. The board is undertaking a full hearing on the application, despite the court ruling and settlement agreement.
And one has to ask why. If you have driven on Purchase Street over the last couple of years you have noticed how bad traffic congestion has become. Purchase Street has gone from 18’ in width to 75’ in some areas, with traffic signals having to be installed to handle the additional traffic generated by the office parks. The plans for this second building anticipate even further traffic increases, calling for additional widening of Purchase Street and Manhattanville Road to form turning lanes.
It was clear that the proposal for a second building was inappropriate 25 years ago and it should be even more clear now.
It was also clear to judges hearing the issue that the decision should have been made internally. In fact, the judges made a statement that this should have been an issue for municipal rule.
So now the planning board has the opportunity to do the right thing again, this time even backed by a pre-existing agreement from the applicant dating back to 1984 and a stipulation from the New York State Supreme Court.
The next planning board hearing date for Parcel B is April 26. We watch and hope that the board will at last step up and say "no" to this application, making it clear that the buck really does stop here.
anne gold
4:57 pm on Wednesday, April 13, 2011
We have been seeking to get a reading on community sentiment about this latest expansion plan, and we have found that there is virtually universal opposition to the idea.Our informal polling has failed to identify anyone in who wants to see further expansion of this office complex. The fact is that the matter was resolved by the courts more than 25 years ago, and people are legitimately wondering why this whole thing is rearing its head once again. Thanks for the supportive article! Anne Gold, Executive Director, PEPA www.pepany.com
Ross Revira
6:44 pm on Wednesday, April 13, 2011
Dear Ms Gold your comment is totally self serving. Did you poll the entire town or just Purchase? Did you think anybody was going to come out against PEPA considering the social black listing that would occur? The town needs new corporate development and the expansion of the medical facilities on Westchester Ave. Harrison is a community for all income and social levels not just for the wealthy and privileged.
anne gold
11:29 am on Friday, April 15, 2011
Ross,
In response to your question if I contacted people living outside of Purchase. Yes! In fact PEPA has townwide support onthis issue. Please read the transcript of the 7/22/2008 Harrison Planning Board http://www.town.harrison.ny.us/docs/PlanningZoning/ParcelBOfficeBldg/Volume%20I%20Appendix%2011.pdf
Beginning on Page 20 you will see that members of nearly every residential zoning district in Harrison asked that the application be denied that evening. The fact is this is not a Purchase issue. If approved this application will set precedents that affect all of Harrison.
Further PEPA has served when asked on several Town Task Force committees and works with neighbors on issues through HArriosn. Our theme is one Town. Working together we strengthen Harrison.
Finally I appreciate your interest and welcome discussion on the topic. However may I ask you to please keep the conversation respectful.
The Truth Hurts
8:26 pm on Wednesday, April 13, 2011
Purchase Street 75 feet wide, Where? Traffic lights added to handle all the additional traffic, are you kidding! There are four traffic lights on Purchase St. All at large intersections. Anderson Hill Rd. Hutch. Pky. north and south exit ramps and Westchester Ave.
Mary Malara
9:49 pm on Thursday, April 14, 2011
I would like to respond to Mr. Revira. Ms. Gold's comments are not self serving, as they are made as spokesperson for an entire group of people, members of PEPA. Her comment about the polling applies to THIS office complex, not all of Westchester Ave. Not all members of PEPA are wealthy and privileged, but all members ARE concerned about overdevelopment in Harrison. If you believe the town needs new corporate development and expansion of the medical facilities on Westchester Ave., then that development must be done legally, within the towns zoning regulations, and with the best interests of Harrison residents in mind, not just the developers.
Ross Revira
11:01 pm on Thursday, April 14, 2011
Who did Ms Gold poll? She states there is universal opposition which would imply more than just PEPA members or is PEPA the only residents that matter? Ms. Malara how many blue collar members are there in PEPA besides the ones that clean up after meetings?
anne gold
11:31 am on Friday, April 15, 2011
Ross,
I did reply to this comment earlier.
Please read the transcript of the 7/22/2008 Harrison Planning Board http://www.town.harrison.ny.us/docs/PlanningZoning/ParcelBOfficeBldg/Volume%20I%20Appendix%2011.pdf
Beginning on Page 20 you will see that members of nearly every residential zoning district in Harrison asked that the application be denied that evening
douglas b. schaper
9:58 pm on Thursday, April 14, 2011
Can't be kidding about traffic lights which, if headed south, are obfuscated by the underpass under the Hutch headed South from all the congestion in the area of Mastercard, Manhattanville, The Centre, Morgan Stanley and Suny - not to mention Pepsi. Is this Purchase a residential area we're talking about or a corporate alley ? Taking the gem of Harrison's residential tax base and cutting it up around the edges - and through its heart - doesn't at first glance, nor even after long meditation, appear to be the kind of solid management Harrison needs if its to survive as a small town on the outskirts of NYC. That may well be why the Judge determined it was not a sound proposal, and why it isn't. Enough of development greed chewing at this town at the expense of its rural, bucolic, small town character....
douglas b. schaper
11:31 pm on Thursday, April 14, 2011
Ross - Stop in at the Purchase Deli and see what they say, or ask the folks at the firehouse.....
Does one have to be rich to dislike traffic congestion, more wasted time, less open space and greedy developers ?
The Truth Hurts
12:03 am on Friday, April 15, 2011
You know Doug you're right. All that traffic congestion and greedy developers are really killing Purchase. I know some who just sold there home and they were only able to get 6,000,000 dollars for it.
douglas b. schaper
12:22 am on Friday, April 15, 2011
You're obviously angry at all those filthy rich folks in Purchase. Lets subdivide the whole thing and use those divisions to build low income housing; it'll do wonders for home prices - and your tax bill. And what, pray tell, might the owner have gotten for their home one, two or three years ago ? My property value is going down and my tax bill is going up. Ever ask yourself why ? Rye's home values don't go down as much as ours do and their tax bill doesn't go up like ours does. Same with Scarsdale. Again, ever ask yourself why ? With all that development is Purchase more or less desirable to folks who can pay 6MM for a home ? What do you know of what those owners paid for their home ? And When they bought it?
Ross Revira
7:41 am on Friday, April 15, 2011
Now Doug let’s keep things in perspective. Nobody is advocating slicing up Purchase into low income housing but when a high end senior housing development was proposed Purchase residents opposed it. I guess they feared too many alcohol fueled parties. How can you complain about your taxes going up when you contributed almost three times more to the Barack Obama campaign than you did to John McCain? I would think you are getting your just deserts.
Katherine Frankel
8:25 am on Friday, April 15, 2011
Truth Hurts, I appreciate your input on this debate. The area of road that I was referring to being 75 feet in width is the road directly in front of parcel A or Master Card, on Purchase Street up to Manhattanville road. Thanks and I look forward to hearing further input from you on this and other issues. Kathy
Mary Malara
9:06 am on Friday, April 15, 2011
Mr. Revira: I stand by my comments about this development needing to be considered under the law, as it relates to our zoning code, and with the best interests of Harrison residents in mind. I do not wish to belittle residents, age groups, socio economic groups, environmental groups or political parties as your comments attempt to do, but I do wish to engage in a thoughtful and respectful exchange of ideas and opinions, which is what this country is based on. I still really do not know your position on this particular development, but the planning board meeting is next week if you are interested in sharing it then. It is through open dialogue and a sharing of points of view that problems get solved and goals are achieved, and this forum could and should be used for that purpose above all.
douglas b. schaper
10:37 am on Friday, April 15, 2011
Ross!
Keeping things in perspective means Obama isn't responsible for our 14 trillion debt. i was for john McCain until he launched Ms. Palin, and his campaign, into the realm of Disney's Fantasia. Bankers should hang for their actions in this mess, as should the rating agencies, who now rate Harrison's debt as investment grade, and the "regulators" along with Fred and Fannie. I put Harrison's planning board, town council and mayor in the same quality grouping as these actors.... As for the "high end" senior housing development, it is understandable Purchase doesn't want to change its character, and putting an Osborn like development into Purchase is understandably not in character with what Purchase has been for a few hundred years.
How do you feel about putting McDonalds into Civil War battle sites ? Purchase, again, is one of Harrison's gems, getting cynical about a $6MM home sale strikes at the heart of what Purchase is all about AND Harrison's revenue base. Just desserts? Most folks who have millions don't spend their filthy lucre as did George Bush and the wonderful, service oriented Dick Cheney did ours... I saw how Dick Cheney paid 17% on his millions of income while he was Veep and collecting millions from Halliburton and its no bid govt. contracts, so please spare us the rhetoric about Obama and just desserts.. If you don't want Purchase to be a high-end residential area then tell us where the taxes should come from.... Texaco like corporate sponsors ?
Ross Revira
2:47 pm on Friday, April 15, 2011
You mention your family has lived in Harrison for generations but have no history of Harrison. Purchase has continually evolved over the last 150 years. The center of Harrison was Purchase until the railroad came to town. Anderson Hill Rd. was called Harrison Ave. back then. 50 years ago Purchase was at the end of its landed gentry stage with large estates and gentleman farms. Over the last half century Purchase College and Keio Academy have been built. Manhattenville College has expanded. Pepsico and Master Card are corporate residents along with many other companies. Numerous country clubs and luxury sub- divisions inhabit Purchase. To say that an Osborn like senior housing complex does not fit the character of Purchase shows your ignorance or your arrogance. Have you ever seen the beautiful housing they have in Rye? You betray your bias by defending Obama and attacking Bush, Cheney and Palin. You mention our 14 trillion dollar deficit and lay it at the feet of Republicans and ignore the fact that under Obama the US is borrowing 42 cents on every dollar spent. After seeing your diatribe at the town board meeting I would have to conclude you have a natural anathema toward the police and exhibit the classic traits of a “limousine liberal”.
The Truth Hurts
3:26 pm on Friday, April 15, 2011
Well said!
douglas b. schaper
3:25 pm on Friday, April 15, 2011
Ross Old Buddy, Limousine liberal ?
Ignorance or arrogance ? Why not both.
Don't know the history ? We bought our first dog at Balmoral Kennels on Kenilworth road in 1954 where SUNY now is. NYC has Rockefeller Center, Times Sq. and Central Park - the issue is the question of balance. Cheney and Rumsfeld and laying it out at Bush's feet - as you lay it all at Obama's? My friends in the Air Force were driving around in armored Humvees in Montana guarding ICBMs while our folks in Iraq had SUVs.
Hate the police ? Best cops i ever saw were Harrison's in the late 70s; i don't like Harrison's police management, not the police. Try getting your facts down and leave the heat in the kitchen.
Ross Revira
5:00 pm on Friday, April 15, 2011
I think the only heat here is under your collar. 1954, you are still a newcomer. SUNY Purchase is on Anderson Hill Rd. not Kenilworth. Admit it you don’t like Chief Marraccini, is it because he is a Republican? Best cops you saw were in the 70’s, are you blind? Get your facts straight and take your liberal Democrat blinders off.
Dr. Vinny Boombatza
5:26 pm on Friday, April 15, 2011
Not fair Ross, My wife and I are die hard democrats and we love the chief, think the mayor and Vetere are "Unique" and voted for Reagan....Twice! Just chalk it up to persoanl opinion. Yep, we all have one! By the way, Balmoral Kennel was located on Harison Avenue. It is still in business under another name. It is 5 miles away from SUNY.
Dr. Vinny Boombatza
5:08 pm on Friday, April 15, 2011
Doug, Ross, Mary, Ms Gold: Enough! Purchase and West Harrison are just zip codes! We all live in the Town-Village of Harrison. There is no "Special" part of our community. Why PEPA? Why not HEPA? Why? Because this group is obviously only concerned about what happens in Purchase. PEPA was conceived with the notion that Purchase had to "Protect" itself from the rest of the town while using the "Environment" as a nice way to cover its real purpose. You haven't heard one comment about protecting the physical environment. In fact the group is more focused on preserving the social and economic environment. Let's stop the BS. This is a case between the haves and the have not-a-lots. Personally I am 100% for more tax paying corporate development along the Purchase corridor so my family can keep our homes. I only live 12 feet from my neighbor and love where I am. I really don't care if someone has to live next to a corporate neighbor when I have the train tracks a block away. So, when it's all said and done, for all of us, it just comes down to $. Let's not BS each other anymore with lofty ideals and phony concerns. Ross, they aren't Limousine Liberals. They are Westchester Liberals. "Sure I believe anyone should live anywhere they want, just as long as it's not next door to me!" How we digressed to Obama, Bush and Cheney is beyond me. I just want parcel "B" to be developed so more taxes dollars are brought in. Sorry it might cause more traffic. Try living on Harrison Avenue.
Ross Revira
6:04 pm on Friday, April 15, 2011
You are a Blue Dog Democrat maybe I have you all wrong.
fm16
12:25 pm on Saturday, April 16, 2011
Doug, Ross, and All: I hate to say this but the Purchase section of town was really affected by the State of New York and the politicians who decided to build S.U.N.Y. Purchase. Do you realize what that costs Harrison. They almost killed the Purchase Volunteer Fire Department who now has volunteers sleeping there because of the call volume to the college, and by the way Manhattanville College is not far behind. By far the traffic on Anderson Hill Road is the worst bar none. Where was everyone when they destroyed Westchester Avenue and all of the trees and what character was left. Wait untill you see the new Westchester Avenue interchange. How come we let Sloan Kettering change a office building to a hospital who will pay no taxes, you think we should of bought the property from Verizon before Houlihan did for the Town House, Court, And Police. You think they won't sell 400 Westchester Ave to the college?. Parcel B could be built without adding traffic to Purchase Street. And by the way our good neighbors at Manhattanville have been building things for years with no permits, installed parking lot lights with no permits, did major renovations with no permits.Great neighbors. The change to medical facilities along Westchester Avenue is causing major issues with traffic, fire response, ambulance response, and Police. We need a full time Planner like Pat Cleary to meet with Town Committees before these things go to the Planning Board. If we don't change things now.
Michael LaDore
3:20 pm on Saturday, April 16, 2011
Doesn't this all come down to UPDATING OUR MASTER PLAN? The master plan is the blueprint for community preservation and development. It determines where we should build, where we should preserve open space, etc, etc. Without it, this just proves that we are a floundering community with no goals in sight. We cannot continue to arbitrarily allow variances that only benefit special interests, because in the end it costs us more money. Bringing in tax dollars is always great, but what would the costs be in providing additional public services in filling two parcels versus one? Traffic increases, police presence increases, fire protection, etc. etc. etc. Development does not always mean more tax dollars in the town's coffers if it costs more to protect/maintain in 10 years from now. The application should be denied.
fm16
5:17 pm on Saturday, April 16, 2011
You are right Mike we need to do more then we are doing for sure and the Master Plan should have been completed years ago.
The Truth Hurts
5:44 pm on Saturday, April 16, 2011
I think that was one of many campaign promises made by our mayor.
Rob Porto Sr.
9:07 pm on Saturday, April 16, 2011
There was a legaly binding agreement in the past so this could not happen. Now the corporate lawyers seem to have found a way to get around that. I was at the planning board meeting when Mr. Pirro basically threatened the planning board (Us) by saying "I'll see you in court" What are the names of the owners and developers that support this activity and behavior?